At UK Fact Check, we use artificial intelligence as a support tool across research, drafting, and verification. All published journalism is subject to human editorial oversight, with editors responsible for the accuracy, fairness and context of the final work.
Our policy is to verify material facts with primary or reputable secondary sources before publication. If any error is identified post‑publication — whether introduced by human or AI assistance — we correct it promptly and transparently in line with our Corrections policy.
We do not disclaim responsibility for our output. Editorial accountability rests with UK Fact Check and the named authors/editors, consistent with our commitment to accuracy and public trust.
The UK Fact Check mission is to unify independent news, to challenge the legacy media narrative. To simplify Indie news dissemination to the critical masses, by making it as accessible and as convenient as possible. To become and remain the technological, democratic, immutable, monetisation, web 3.0 content publication standard.
UK Fact Check shall, and forever adhere to the following principles and standards:
Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting, and interpreting information.
Journalists should:
Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues, and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.
Journalists should:
The highest and primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public.
Journalists should:
Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one's work and explaining one's decisions to the public.
Journalists should:
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists. The complex issues we face as a society require respect for different viewpoints. Race, class, generation, gender, and geography all affect point of view. Reflecting these differences in our reporting leads to better nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
Across our output as a whole, we must be inclusive, reflecting a breadth and diversity of opinion. We must be fair and open-minded when examining the evidence and weighting material facts. We must give due weight to the many and diverse areas of an argument.