At UK Fact Check, we use artificial intelligence as a support tool across research, drafting, and verification. All published journalism is subject to human editorial oversight, with editors responsible for the accuracy, fairness and context of the final work.
Our policy is to verify material facts with primary or reputable secondary sources before publication. If any error is identified post‑publication — whether introduced by human or AI assistance — we correct it promptly and transparently in line with our Corrections policy.
We do not disclaim responsibility for our output. Editorial accountability rests with UK Fact Check and the named authors/editors, consistent with our commitment to accuracy and public trust.
The UK Fact Check mission is to unify independent news, to challenge the legacy media narrative. To simplify Indie news dissemination to the critical masses, by making it as accessible and as convenient as possible. To become and remain the technological, democratic, immutable, monetisation, web 3.0 content publication standard.
UK Fact Check shall, and forever adhere to the following principles and standards:
Ethical journalism should be accurate and fair. Journalists should be honest and courageous in gathering, reporting, and interpreting information.
Journalists should:
Ethical journalism treats sources, subjects, colleagues, and members of the public as human beings deserving of respect.
Journalists should:
The highest and primary obligation of ethical journalism is to serve the public.
Journalists should:
Ethical journalism means taking responsibility for one's work and explaining one's decisions to the public.
Journalists should:
Inclusiveness is at the heart of thinking and acting as journalists. The complex issues we face as a society require respect for different viewpoints. Race, class, generation, gender, and geography all affect point of view. Reflecting these differences in our reporting leads to better nuanced stories and a better-informed community.
Across our output as a whole, we must be inclusive, reflecting a breadth and diversity of opinion. We must be fair and open-minded when examining the evidence and weighting material facts. We must give due weight to the many and diverse areas of an argument.
All writers submitting content to UK Fact Check must comply with the following rules. These exist to protect the integrity of our journalism and the trust of our readers.
Every submission must be unique to UK Fact Check. If a story already exists on another website, news outlet, or blog, it will be rejected. This is our most important rule. Writers who persistently submit non-original content will be removed from the writer programme without further consideration.
All articles must be supported by at least two independent sources. Writers should supply all sources and supporting evidence with their submission. UK Fact Check reserves the right to request additional documentation at any time, and writers must be prepared to provide it promptly.
Every submission is automatically run through our AI fact-checking system. Articles that score below 60 are automatically rejected and will not proceed to editorial review. Writers should ensure all claims are verifiable and accurately represented before submitting.
We accept stories about UK politics, UK news, and world politics and events. Submissions on topics outside this scope will not be considered for publication.
We are especially looking for detailed, well-researched fact checks. These consistently perform well with our readership and are often among the highest-remunerated articles on the platform. Writers are strongly encouraged to consider fact-check formats when choosing their next submission.
While AI tools may be used as research and drafting aids, submissions that are clearly AI-generated without meaningful human editorial input — commonly known as "AI slop" — will be rejected. Writers who persistently submit AI-generated content will be terminated from the programme. All published work must reflect genuine human judgement, analysis, and editorial voice.
Violations of these rules may result in rejection of individual submissions. Repeated or serious violations — particularly regarding originality and AI-generated content — will result in the writer being permanently removed from the UK Fact Check writer programme.